media

Weapons of mass distraction

On July 12, 2007 in Baghdad 12 civilians, including a Reuters photographer and his driver, were shot dead by a U.S. Apache helicopter. Because of the involvement of the Reuters staff, this became minor news and the Pentagon gave a statement on the circumstances surrounding the events: nine 'rebels' and two civilians were killed (the Reuters employees). That seemed to be end of the case. Reuters tried to research the circumstances of the shooting but was blocked by the U.S. government. A formal request for access to videos of the Apache helicopter and audio communication between the crew and ground troops was refused. At that time the story was a tiny blip on the news radar, and quickly forgotten. There have been over 100 journalists killed in Iraq since March 2003 and an estimated 700,000 to over 1.3 million civilians (the U.S. military sees no need to keep track of exactly how many - "we do not do body counts").

Nearly three years later the incident is known worldwide because of the online release of 38 minutes of video recorded by the Apache helicopter involved in the incident. The shortened version on Youtube has been viewed over 6 million times. For anyone who thinks the Iraq invasion was a good idea, watch the full 38 minutes. Twice. A wealth of supporting information is available at collateralmurder.com. On Dutch TV activist and hacker extraordinaire Rop Gonggrijp was invited to give some background to the video. The anchor closed the item with the immortal words "well, it's a good story." Former Chief of Staff General Hans Couzy had called the actions of the Apache crew a war crime one day earlier.

Waar de iPad goed voor is

<webwereld column>

In 1994 maakte ik een jaarboek lay-out op een tablet, niks nieuws dusMet enige verbazing heb ik de laatste maanden weer gezien hoe de de gestaalde kaders van Steve Jobs' cult of Mac een 15 jaar oud concept de hemel in hebben gehypt. Vanaf het moment dat de technische specificaties van de iPad bekend werden was het voor mij duidelijk dat ik er geen zou gaan kopen. De iPad is een iPhone++ en dat geldt helaas ook voor het niveau van controle dat Apple wil houden over alle aspecten van het gebruikt er van. Apple bepaalt welke applicaties je mag draaien, welke mediabronnen acceptabel zijn en in welke formats die mediabronnen worden opgeslagen. De iPad is daarmee vergelijkbaar met de AOL-ervaring van het Internet van ruim 12 jaar geleden. Een ommuurde tuin waar de klant 'beschermd' wordt tegen de chaotische vrijheid van het open Internet en stevig moet betalen voor dat voorrecht.

What the iPad is good for

In 1994 I edited a student yearbook on a tablet, so nothing new reallyWith some surprise I have in recent months seen how the drone-armies of Steve Jobs' cult of Mac, hyped a 15 year old concept into sainthood. From the moment the technical specifications of the iPad became known, it was clear to me that I would not be buying. The iPad is an iPhone + + and that is unfortunately the level of control that Apple will take over all aspects of the use of it. Apple determines which applications you can run, which media sources are acceptable and in what formats those media sources are stored. The iPad is comparable with the AOL Internet experience of over 12 years ago. A walled garden where customers are 'protected' from the chaotic freedom that is the open Internet and are made to pay for the privilege.

Hamburg Declaration, kranten kunnen het Net niet

Afgelopen maand hebben een groep Europese nieuw uitgevers de z.g. 'Hamburg Declaration' opgesteld. Hierin eisen zij dat de Europese overheid maatregelen neem om het hergebruik (zij noemen het diefstal) van 'hun' content. Ze willen geld kunnen vragen voor hun nieuws zoals ze dat gewend zijn bij de papieren versie.

Will Apple be the next Sony?

Appletv I normally don't review products or specifically recommend them but the difference between the success of the iPod and Apple TV teaches some important lessons to anyone with ambitions in the digitized media markets of the 21st century.

Apple TV's competitor is not the video rental store on the corner, it's not even online companies like Netflix. It's The Piratebay and sites like it. And it will be hard to re-learn new customers to buy media for watching though devices like Apple TV when they've been using somewhat comparable devices for freely watching media for a few years.

Will Apple be the next Sony?

Appletv I normally don't review products or specifically recommend them but the difference between the success of the iPod and Apple TV teaches some important lessons to anyone with ambitions in the digitized media markets of the 21st century.

Apple TV's competitor is not the video rental store on the corner, it's not even online companies like Netflix. It's The Piratebay and sites like it. And it will be hard to re-learn new customers to buy media for watching though devices like Apple TV when they've been using somewhat comparable devices for freely watching media for a few years.

Syndicate content